#Download Alpha Blondy Yitzhak Rabin Rar software#
#Download Alpha Blondy Yitzhak Rabin Rar code#
#Download Alpha Blondy Yitzhak Rabin Rar windows#

The Network stack was integral to NT’s design, and an afterthought (originally) in VMS, etc, etc…Īgain, they didn’t use the VMS source code, but rather tapped into the brain of the guy that built it. Their systems language, toolchains, API, executable object format, etc, bear little relation. NT is/was a microkernel(ish), VMS is a textbook monolithic kernel.

I simply said that in many areas, NT and VMS are diametrically opposite in terms of design and implementation. I did not argue NT has features that VMS doesn’t (you seem love strawmen for whatever reason). Arguing that it has features that VMS didn’t is pointless.

#Download Alpha Blondy Yitzhak Rabin Rar windows#

Windows NT IS heavily based on VMS’ design. But you would not claim the main difference between Unix and QNX is just a matter of copyright, would you? The same can be said of just about any Unix-like system, a Bash shell on QNX for example. In fact, if you’d change the shell from the posix shell to bash on say HP-UX, a normal linux user would get around just fine for a lot of tasks. Usually those words tend to be a tacit admission of a faulty argument. I never claimed they used unix source code.

#Download Alpha Blondy Yitzhak Rabin Rar code#

I know of plenty of code that is source compatible between VMS and Unix, does that imply VMS is based on Unix too then? Being POSIX-compatible and UNIX-based/derived are two very different things. That’s due mainly to POSIX compatibility. The systems are largely source compatible. (stupid charms menu won’t show up when you mouse over it but pops up randomly)Īny and all commands/binaries on a gnu/linux system work nearly identically to their unix counterparts. cpl applets and launches them from a run prompt like I did with Windows 8. Then their IT staff either can’t function or resorts to memorizing all the. The thing that stinks about Windows is if they make it too customizable then corporations would have a fit when all their users want their settings from home. On a laptop or desktop I probably won’t give up the three menus made famous by Gnome 2 (Application, Places, and System) as I have come to find it very usable. I personally think a themed set of terminals is the coolest looking system ever, but it is too much of a pain in my rear end to try to live there. There are people who like Gnome 3 (ducks), and if I were on a tablet I would probably prefer Gnome 3 to my usual choices. (although I have some doubts on how many)

I think that there are people who will appreciate the aesthetic qualities of Windows 10. Add a function to switch quickly between “environments”, and you have something that’s somewhere between OS/2 work folders, and KDE activities.

#Download Alpha Blondy Yitzhak Rabin Rar software#

Of course, to pull out my soapbox, you could have a shortcut that when you open it, opens up your tax records, your billing / tax / AR software (as appropriate), and then shuts it all down when you close that shortcut– and another one for music. While I’m a huge proponent of tabs in a browser, that’s mainly so I can read an article (or news site) and spawn off tabs with links I want to look at later. I realize that MDI is no longer “cool”, but it’s a perfectly valid solution. Sounds like a way to use multiple desktops, personally– although really, there’s no reason you can’t have both windows open and alt-tab between them. But, I really don’t see that as a killer feature that I can’t live without.

I can see how some people might prefer just one with two tabs. No reason to move tax documents into the music folder or visa versa, but I might have two different file browsers open for those two areas. So it might be useful to have just one explorer with different tabs to separate the two tasks.įor a quick and dumb example: browsing a music folder, while working on a collection of documents for tax purposes. I often work on different tasks at the same time that require file system manipulation in different areas, but not necessarily requiring interaction between the two areas of the file system. Not exactly sure what everyone’s usecase is, but it might be useful for mine.